THE COMPETENCE APPROACH IN TEACHING THE SECOND FOREIGN LANGUAGE AT NON-LINGUISTIC UNIVERSITY
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Анотація
The article deals with the main purpose of teaching the first and the second foreign languages at higher school. It is stated that the development of the ability and readiness of future experts from different specialties to intercultural communication promote to develop professional communicative competence. The article points out the using of different language teaching methods in order to give future specialists an opportunity to enter into European international educational and professional space.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Ця ліцензія дозволяє вільно
- поширювати — копіювати і розповсюджувати матеріал у будь-якому вигляді чи форматі;
- змінювати — реміксувати, трансформувати, і брати матеріал за основу для будь-яких цілей, навіть комерційних
на наступних умовах:
-
зазначення Авторства — має вказуватися автор, розміщуватися посилання на ліцензію та вказуватися чи було внесено зміни до твору. Це може бути зроблено у будь-який розумний спосіб, але так, щоб не створювалося враження стосовно того, що ліцензіар підтримує чи схвалює автора або авторське використання твору;
- без додаткових обмежень — не можуть висуватися додаткові умови або застосовуватися технологічні засоби захисту, що обмежують права інших на дії дозволені ліцензією.
Посилання
Alderson et al. (2004). The development of specifications for item development and classification within the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment: Reading and Listening: Final report of The Dutch CEF Construct Project.
Baryshnikov N. (1995). French as the second foreign language and features of its teaching methodology. Foreign languages at school, 4, 27-29.
Bliss A. (1996). A Dictionary of Foreign Words and Phrases in Current English. L., N. Y. : Routledge.
Joël Bellassen. (2011). Is Chinese Europcompatible? Is the Common European Framework Common? : The Common European Framework of References for Languages Facing Distant Language. New Prospect for Foreign Language Teaching in Higher Education — Exploring The Possibilities of Application of CECR, Tokyo, World Language and Society Education Center (WoLSEC). p. 23–31 (ISBN 978-4-925243-85-8)
Centre de langue française de la Direction des relations internationales de l'enseignement. http://www.fda.ccip.fr
Conseil de l'Europe C.E. (2001). Un cadre européen commun de référence pour les langues: apprendre, enseigner, évaluer. Didier. (ISBN 9782278050758) Coroller C. En France, le bilinguisme est courant. http://www.libération.fr/
Council of Europe E. C. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge University Press. (ISBN 9780521005319)
Cuq J.-P. (2003). Dictionnaire de didactique du français langue étrangère et seconde. CLE International, S.E.J.E.R. Paris.
Halskova N., Hez N. (2007). The theory of teaching foreign languages. Linguodidactics and methods (4th ed.). M : Publishing Center «Academy»
Hanna B., & De Nooy J. (2003). A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum: Electronic Discussion and Foreign Language Learning. Language Learning & Technology. 7(1), 71–85. http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num1/hanna/default.html .
Hanna B., & De Nooy J. (2009). Learning language and culture via public Internet discussion forums. Basingstoke [England]; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lazariev O. (2017). The work program of discipline «The second foreign language (French)». Field ofexpertise – 1401 Service sector Specialty – 242 Tourism. Uman: National University of Horticulture.
Lazariev O. V. (2017) French. Teaching materials and recommendations for the implementation of individual work for students on the specialty of «Tourism». Uman: National University of Horticulture. Little D. (2006). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Content, Purpose, Origin, Reception and Impact. Language Teaching. Vol. 39( 03), 167–190.
Little D. (2007). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Perspectives on the Making of Supranational Language Education Policy. The Modern Language Journal. Vol. 9( 4), 645–655.
Little D. (2006). «The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Content, Purpose, Origin, Reception and Impact», Language Teaching. Vol. 39 (03), 167–190.
Litvinova Y. M. (2009). The problem of interference in teaching foreign languages. Jornal of Ural Government Pedagogical University. 1, 74 - 80.
Movchan Liudmyla. (2016, January) Agrarian education at the higher educational institutions of Ukraine (pp. 113 – 117). Humanities and social sciences in Europe: Achievements and Perspectives. Proceedings of the 9thInternational Symposium. «East West» Association for advanced studies and higher education. Vienna. URL : http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25706218
Petrova A. A. (2016). Teaching foreign languages (German and French) in the 2016/17 academic year. Guidelines. Mykolaiv : OIPPO. State Standard of Secondary Education. http://www.mon.gov.ua/ua//often-requested/statestandards/
Rosen E. (2010). Le point sur le Cadre européen commun de référence pour les langues. CLE international.
Shepilova A. V. (2000). Implementation of the comparative approach in teaching French as a second language. Foreign languages at school. 2, 25 – 26.
Shatskaia M. A. (2003). Some examples of supports in English when teaching French as a second foreign language. Foreign languages at school. 3, 44 – 45.
Veremienko S. Y., Korsun Y. O. The concept of bilingualism, its variants and using in the learning process. www.nbuv.gov.ua