Modern administrative technologies of estimation activity of general educational institution

Анотація

Introduction. Estimation activity of general educational institution is one the most difficult administrative procedures. At the same time the problem is not in the estimation as definite procedure, but in the achievement exactly its objectivity. Among the reasons, which stipulate a certain problem, it is necessary to point out such ones: lack of agreed structure of educational services estimation on the basis of administrative technologies, imperfection of estimation methods, incompetence of experts.

Purpose. Make analysis of modern administrative technologies of general education institution; having determined their main peculiarities.

Results. Main modern administrative technologies of general education institution estimation are considered: expert estimation, certification, inspecting, diagnostics, monitoring, diagnostic monitoring, audit. The reasons which provoke the problem of objectivity of school activity estimation on the basis of administrative technologies, imperfection of estimation, incompetence of experts are analyzed. 

Analysis of peculiarities of modern education institution estimation methods, which experts use for this procedure is fulfilled, it includes: Standard program of complex control of educational institution; unified statement of subjects’ keeping control concerning management, giving services in the sphere of secondary education, legislative demands in the sphere of compulsory secondary education. Approximate criteria of estimation of general education institution activity (have lost validity now but undoubtedly have methodical value), system of expert estimation of teaching-educational activity of O. S. Bodnar’s schools providing general education.

Originality. Personal structure of educational services estimation on the basis of administrative technologies with detailed characteristics of estimation forms on external level (educational and public bodies management) as well as on internal one (general education institution).  

The meaning “diagnostic monitoring” is substituted for “monitoring” on the basis of semantic dubbing-in. Audit is included in the technology of estimation, fulfilling on the external level by public, because this technology is directed exactly to the public estimation of educational institutions activity and besides on voluntary lines from latest. Forms of state control (certification and inspecting) are defined at the same as time as administrative technologies of estimation, but control and estimation in the present context are actually synonymic, because control from the state side provides first of all defining of correspondence of services given by school to state demands as well as inquiries of society. 

Conclusion. Estimation activity of institution has to become a foundation of its subsequent effective development, but it is possible under the circumstances of high level of this procedure objectivity. Both level of experts’ readiness for the procedure of estimation and imperfection of estimation methods remain problematic now.

          With the bounds of subsequent research of the problem of general education institution activity it is necessary to pay attention to the development of innovation approaches concerning estimation methods of modern school activity.