GLOBALIZATION AND NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE
Main Article Content
Abstract
The main issue: As we enter the new age of technology, there is hardly an area in the life of society that can avoid globalization or global influences. Globalization has rapidly penetrated the most diverse spheres of our lives: economic, political, social, educational, and cultural, shaping the future of humanity. Based on modern observations of globalization, we can distinguish two understandings: globalization as an objective process with universal approaches to face modern challenges and globalization as a process of unification imposed on the world. Sociological surveys were conducted on this issue to substantiate the views discussed in the research. As a result, we identified the following parallels between globalization and the preservation of national identity.
Positive:
- It serves as a sustainable process of interaction and integration between different regions and countries.
- It offers a wide range of possibilities for an abundance of ideas and free economic activity.
- It provides a global workforce equivalent to the global labor market.
- It allows for the evaluability and comparability of national higher education with international standards.
- It contributes to the formation of a creative and harmonious personality that is responsible for the present and future of the world.
Negative:
- It leads to the change of national identity, national culture, and mentality due to the information flow and the influence of the Internet.
- It promotes a consumer attitude towards values.
- It results in the bypassing or ignoring of national traditions and customs, giving priority to foreign values.
- It involves active intervention by external forces.
It is undeniable that globalization, with its rising and falling trends, has become a part of our reality. Moreover, as it continues, it expands into new horizons, including economic, legal, environmental, health, cultural, educational, and other spheres of public life. This proves that it is difficult for any country to escape from this reality, but it is possible to judiciously use the tools of globalization, which can ensure a favorable position for the country in the global world. Therefore, globalization poses a challenge not only to redefine what is necessary for a citizen of the 21st century, but also to determine its ultimate goal, what it will provide to humanity, and to what extent it will ensure social justice in society.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ця ліцензія дозволяє вільно
- поширювати — копіювати і розповсюджувати матеріал у будь-якому вигляді чи форматі;
- змінювати — реміксувати, трансформувати, і брати матеріал за основу для будь-яких цілей, навіть комерційних
на наступних умовах:
-
зазначення Авторства — має вказуватися автор, розміщуватися посилання на ліцензію та вказуватися чи було внесено зміни до твору. Це може бути зроблено у будь-який розумний спосіб, але так, щоб не створювалося враження стосовно того, що ліцензіар підтримує чи схвалює автора або авторське використання твору;
- без додаткових обмежень — не можуть висуватися додаткові умови або застосовуватися технологічні засоби захисту, що обмежують права інших на дії дозволені ліцензією.
References
Scholte J. What is globalization? The definitional issue-again. CSGR Working Paper No. 109/02. December 2002. 34 p. URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/2010/1/WRAP_Scholte_wp10902.pdf.
Wolf M. Will globalization survive? Third Whitman Lecture, Institute for International Economics, Washington DC. April 5, 2005. URL: https://www.piie.com/sites/default/files/publications/papers/wolf0405.pdf.
Bordo M., Taylor A. and Williamson J. (eds). Globalization in historical perspective. University of Chicago, 2007. 597 p.
Friedman T. It’s a flat world, after all. The New York Times, 2005. No 3. PP. 33–37.
Առաքելյան Լ․ Խճանկարային մշակույթ․ Անհատի արժեհամակարգային փոփոխությունները գլոբալացման արդի փուլում. URL: http://www.diplomat.am/publ/public/14-10-1027 (дата звернення 07.10.2022).
Պետրոսյան Ս․Ս․ Ցեղասպանությունը և հայոց Մենք-նույնության ճգնաժամը. Հայոց ինքնության հարցեր. Երևան: Լիմուշ, 2015. N3. 60 էջ.
Атоян В., Казакова Н. Университет в современном обществе. Высшее образование в России, 2005. N4. С. 3–9.
Հարությունյան Ն․, Գրիգորյան Ա․ Կրթության զարգացման և որակավորման խնդիրները. Մանկավարժական միտք, 2013. N 1–2. 5–8 էջ.
Kwick M. Globalization and higher education. Higher education in Europe, 2001. Vol. 26(1). PP. 27–38.
Akulich M.M. Education in the context of globalization. University management: practice and analysis, 2005. No 5. PP. 50–57.
Ասատրյան Հ․ Հատընտիր. Երևան: Ամարաս, 2004. 93 էջ․